在 2001-02 学年,AFC 试行了一项名为“家庭暴力教育宣传项目”(DVEAP)的项目,该项目为遭受过家庭暴力或虐待并在学校遇到严重问题的儿童提供与学校相关的个人宣传。这些孩子由于患有未被发现和未治疗的创伤相关疾病而无法发挥其学业潜力。AFC 发现,公立学校系统,尤其是特殊教育系统,首当其冲地受到这一问题的困扰。
政策资源
AFC 致力于改变教育政策,以便公立学校系统能够服务于 全部 儿童有效。我们发布政策报告和数据分析,在市和州两级作证,在媒体上发声,让人们关注我们所服务的学生和家庭面临的挑战,并与其他倡导者、家长、青少年和教育工作者一起呼吁改变。
More than 115 Organizations Call for Changes to New York State’s School Funding Formula
Every child in New York State has the right to a sound, basic education—and providing such an education requires adequate and equitable funding. More than 115 organizations are calling on Governor Hochul and the New York State Legislature to revamp New York’s outdated school funding formula to ensure schools have the resources necessary to provide a high-quality education to all students, with particular attention to those who have the greatest needs.找到 161 个结果
本报告评估了纽约市向被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的儿童提供特殊教育服务的方式,特别关注向贫困儿童和有色人种儿童提供服务的方式。
本报告研究了为评估补充教育服务 (SES) 的实施和有效性而进行的调查结果。这些辅导和补习服务于 2002-03 年首次向“需要改进”学校的 240,000 多名符合条件的儿童提供。调查结果显示,纽约市在实施 SES 方面存在重大问题,尤其是对于残疾学生和被归类为英语学习者的学生。
这份由 AFC 协调的最少限制环境 (LRE) 联盟的报告研究了纽约市公立学校的一组项目,这些项目证明将残疾儿童融入普通教育课堂不仅是可能的,而且对于患有许多不同类型残疾和有不同需求的儿童来说也是可取的。
最少限制环境 (LRE) 联盟的这份报告研究了纽约市学校系统中特殊教育服务的历史,以及对如何对待残疾儿童(即通过隔离还是融合)的不同观点。
This 1998 report uncovers and addresses some prevailing problems in New York City public schools with regards to asthma.
This 1992 report argues that the special education system in the New York City public schools is by nature segregated and second rate. It offers recommendations for achieving a more inclusive, effective education for all children.
This paper endorses the placement of children with behavioral and emotionally handicapping conditions in the least restrictive environment.
这份 1990 年的报告讨论了融入的考虑和权利、残疾儿童融入社会的过程、上诉程序以及因特定残疾的融入而出现的问题。
This report examines the May 1984 public hearing on Our Children at Risk: The Crisis in Public Education that was organized by Advocates for Children of New York and co-sponsored by Statewide Youth Advocacy. The hearing focused on three areas that are key to inequity: the denial of equal access to school resources, the denial of equal quality in the learning process, and the denial of open futures in the link between school and work.