跳至内容

Stack of books against a blurred background. (Photo by Kimberly Farmer on Unsplash)

政策资源

AFC 致力于改变教育政策,以便公立学校系统能够服务于 全部 儿童有效。我们发布政策报告和数据分析,在市和州两级作证,在媒体上发声,让人们关注我们所服务的学生和家庭面临的挑战,并与其他倡导者、家长、青少年和教育工作者一起呼吁改变。

70 Results Found

过滤
  • 话题
  • 资源类型
An In-depth Look at Free Tutoring Services Under the No Child Left Behind Act in New York City: A Focus on English Language Learners
Young boy sits in a classroom, looking at the camera
  • 政策报告
  • An In-depth Look at Free Tutoring Services Under the No Child Left Behind Act in New York City: A Focus on English Language Learners

    This 2006 policy brief provides an analysis of NYC Department of Education (DOE) statistics regarding student eligibility and enrollment in Supplemental Education Services (SES) and outlines the results of a survey of all 2004-05 DOE-approved SES Providers.

    Jun 1, 2006

    是否为最需要帮助的人提供服务?纽约市“不让一个孩子掉队”补充教育服务实施情况报告
    Woman looks over the shoulder of a young girl filling out a worksheet. (Photo by Monstera Production via Pexels)
  • 政策报告
  • 是否为最需要帮助的人提供服务?纽约市“不让一个孩子掉队”补充教育服务实施情况报告

    本报告研究了为评估补充教育服务 (SES) 的实施和有效性而进行的调查结果。这些辅导和补习服务于 2002-03 年首次向“需要改进”学校的 240,000 多名符合条件的儿童提供。调查结果显示,纽约市在实施 SES 方面存在重大问题,尤其是对于残疾学生和被归类为英语学习者的学生。

    2003 年 10 月 1 日

    创造成功公式:英语学习者辍学的原因以及如何提高毕业率
    Teenage girl sitting on the floor of a library, reading a book. (Photo by Ludovic Delot via Pexels)
  • 政策报告
  • 创造成功公式:英语学习者辍学的原因以及如何提高毕业率

    这份报告由亚足联和 纽约移民联盟分析了自实施新毕业标准以来英语学习者 (ELL) 的教育成果。报告显示,大多数使用双语或 ESL 课程并得到足够时间和支持的儿童已经熟练掌握英语,并在新州考试中取得最高成功率。报告还显示,目前就读这些课程的学生(其中许多是刚到美国或中断正规教育 (SIFE) 的学生)在新标准下表现最差,辍学人数多于毕业人数。

    2002 年 6 月 18 日

    Report of the New York Hearing on the Crisis in Public Education
  • 政策报告
  • Report of the New York Hearing on the Crisis in Public Education

    This report examines the May 1984 public hearing on Our Children at Risk: The Crisis in Public Education that was organized by Advocates for Children of New York and co-sponsored by Statewide Youth Advocacy. The hearing focused on three areas that are key to inequity: the denial of equal access to school resources, the denial of equal quality in the learning process, and the denial of open futures in the link between school and work.

    Jan 29, 1985