콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Stack of books against a blurred background. (Photo by Kimberly Farmer on Unsplash)

정책 리소스

AFC는 공립학교 시스템이 서비스를 제공할 수 있도록 교육 정책을 변경하기 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 모두 아이들을 효과적으로 우리는 정책 보고서 및 데이터 분석을 게시하고, 시 및 주 차원에서 증언하고, 언론을 통해 우리가 봉사하는 학생과 가족이 직면한 문제에 대한 관심을 환기시키고, 다른 옹호자, 부모, 청소년 및 교육자와 함께 다음 사항을 촉구합니다. 변화.

161개의 결과가 발견되었습니다

필터링 기준
  • 주제
  • 리소스 유형
Children in Crisis: Advocates for Children’s Domestic Violence Education Advocacy Project
Girl sitting on a desk in a classroom, reading a book. (Photo by RDNE Stock project from Pexels)
  • 정책 보고서
  • Children in Crisis: Advocates for Children’s Domestic Violence Education Advocacy Project

    During the 2001-02 school year, AFC piloted a project called the Domestic Violence Education Advocacy Project (DVEAP) that provided individual school-related advocacy for children who had been exposed to domestic violence or abuse and who were having significant problems in school. These children were unable to perform up to their academic potential as a result of suffering from undetected and untreated trauma-related illnesses. AFC found that the public school system, in particular the special education system, bears the brunt of this problem.

    May 1, 2004

    Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders in New York City: An Assessment of Current Special Education Service Delivery
    Young child colors in a coloring book. (Photo by RDNE Stock project from Pexels)
  • 정책 보고서
  • Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders in New York City: An Assessment of Current Special Education Service Delivery

    This report assesses the manner in which special education services are delivered to children in NYC who have been diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders, with a particular focus on the delivery of services to poor children and children of color.

    Apr 30, 2004

    Serving Those Most In Need Or Not? A Report on the Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)’s Supplemental Education Services in New York City
    Woman looks over the shoulder of a young girl filling out a worksheet. (Photo by Monstera Production via Pexels)
  • 정책 보고서
  • Serving Those Most In Need Or Not? A Report on the Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)’s Supplemental Education Services in New York City

    This report examines the results of surveys that were conducted to assess the implementation and effectiveness of Supplemental Education Services (SES). These tutoring and remediation services were provided for the first time in 2002-03 to over 240,000 eligible children in schools “in need of improvement.” The results of the surveys show major problems with implementation of SES in New York City, especially for students with disabilities and those classified as English Language Learners.

    Oct 1, 2003

    함께 배우기: NYC의 통합 교육 수업
    Four schoolboys (ages 8-9) huddling in classroom. (Photo by Cavan for Adobe, Adobe Stock)
  • 정책 보고서
  • 함께 배우기: NYC의 통합 교육 수업

    AFC가 조정한 LRE(최소 제한 환경) 연합의 이 보고서는 장애 아동을 일반 교육 교실에 통합하는 것이 가능할 뿐만 아니라 다양한 장애가 있는 아동에게도 바람직하다는 것을 입증하는 NYC 공립학교의 프로그램 그룹을 조사합니다. 장애 유형과 요구 사항이 다릅니다.

    2002년 10월 1일

    수년이 지난 후에도 여전히 기다리고 있습니다… 뉴욕시 공립학교에 특수 교육이 필요한 아동 포함
    Elementary students sitting on a rug in a classroom. (Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik)
  • 정책 보고서
  • 수년이 지난 후에도 여전히 기다리고 있습니다… 뉴욕시 공립학교에 특수 교육이 필요한 아동 포함

    This report from the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Coalition looks at the history of special education services in the New York City school system and at the differing views regarding how children with disabilities should be treated, i.e., via segregation or inclusion.

    2001년 11월 1일

    Report of the New York Hearing on the Crisis in Public Education
  • 정책 보고서
  • Report of the New York Hearing on the Crisis in Public Education

    This report examines the May 1984 public hearing on Our Children at Risk: The Crisis in Public Education that was organized by Advocates for Children of New York and co-sponsored by Statewide Youth Advocacy. The hearing focused on three areas that are key to inequity: the denial of equal access to school resources, the denial of equal quality in the learning process, and the denial of open futures in the link between school and work.

    Jan 29, 1985